Some of the possible answers are that cultural factors, perchance similar Weber's "Protestant piece of occupation ethic," drive some countries rather than others to adopt novel technology. Or perchance institutional factors similar a legacy of belongings rights together with representative authorities brand some countries likelier to educate technology. Allen argues a dissimilar view: "This newspaper explores an choice explanation of economical evolution based on the graphic symbol of technological alter itself. While the touchstone persuasion assumes that technological progress benefits all countries, this newspaper contends that much technological
progress has been biased towards raising project productivity past times increasing upper-case alphabetic quality intensity. The novel engineering scientific discipline is solely worth inventing together with using inward high wage economies. At the same time, the novel engineering scientific discipline ultimately leads to fifty-fifty higher wages. The upshot is an ascending spiral of progress inward rich countries, but a spiral that it is non profitable for wretched countries to follow because their reward are low."
Simple examples of this phenomenon abound. It is cost effective to install toll scanners inward States of America supermarkets, because it saves the fourth dimension of cashiers, every bit good every bit purchasing together with accounting workers behind the scenes. But for a low-income province amongst much lower wages, saving the fourth dimension of workers isn't worth such an investment. Multiply this representative all across the economy.
Using information on upper-case alphabetic quality per worker together with on gross domestic product per worker across countries at dissimilar periods of time, Allen estimates a basis production function. Here's is the evolution of the basis production component for the catamenia from 1820-1913, together with from 1913 to 1920.
These production functions display some mutual patterns. On the far left, gross domestic product per capita rises inward a more-or-less linear agency amongst upper-case alphabetic quality per worker. On the right, at the technological frontier, gross domestic product per capita doesn't ascension amongst upper-case alphabetic quality per worker. Over time, the technological frontier--where the gains from additional upper-case alphabetic quality per worker don't add together to per capita output--keeps rising. For example, the production component flattens out at virtually $2000 per worker inward 1820, at virtually $4500 per worker inward 1913, $17,000 per worker inward 1965, together with $35,000 per worker inward 1990. Allen suggests that the technological leaders grow past times stages, taking a generation or 2 to perfect the possibilities of i grade of upper-case alphabetic quality per worker, earlier together with then pushing farther upwards the scale.
In this perspective, engineering scientific discipline is quite transferable betwixt countries amongst roughly similar upper-case alphabetic quality to worker ratios: for example, this helps to explicate the convergence inward per capita gross domestic product amid high-income economies inward recent decades. However, low-income countries discovery that the engineering scientific discipline invented past times high-income countries inappropriate for their circumstances; indeed, less capital-intensive engineering scientific discipline from 50 or 100 years agone oftentimes seems to a greater extent than appropriate for them. This perspective also helps to explicate why a ultra-high savings charge per unit of measurement has oftentimes been so of import every bit a precursor to rapid growth inward places similar Nihon inward mid-twentieth-century, together with and then to the East Asian "tiger" economies, together with and then to China. High savings creates a high upper-case alphabetic quality to worker ratio, together with hence makes it much to a greater extent than possible to leapfrog frontward past times adopting technologies closer to the frontier.
Looking ahead, an intriguing query is whether chop-chop emerging economies to a greater extent than or less the basis tin post away acquire their ain source of innovation: that is, tin post away they accept their high savings rates together with depict upon basis technological expertise to create a novel form of cutting-edge conception aimed at their ain domicile market. Can the emerging countries forge their ain technological path? The Economist periodical has been predicting for the concluding pair of years that this procedure is forthwith underway. For example, the Apr 15, 2010 number had a lengthy "Special Report" called "The novel masters of management: Developing countries are competing on inventiveness every bit good every bit cost. That volition alter concern everywhere." Here's a season of the argument:
"Thirty years agone the bosses of America’s machine manufacture were shocked to larn that Nihon had overtaken America to acquire the world’s leading machine producer. They were fifty-fifty to a greater extent than shocked when they visited Nihon to discovery out what was going on. They found that the hole-and-corner of Japan’s success did non prevarication inward inexpensive labour or authorities subsidies (their preferred explanations) but inward what was chop-chop dubbed “lean manufacturing”. While Detroit slept, Nihon had transformed itself from a low-wage economic scheme into a hotbed of concern innovation. Soon every mill to a greater extent than or less the basis was lean—or a ruin. ...This scenario suggests that inward the future, technological alter may non only disseminate gradually from the advanced countries to the residual of the world, every bit countries construct upwards their capital/labor ratios. Instead, technological alter together with its effects may also endure disseminating from the huge emerging markets dorsum to consumers together with firms inward high-income countries.
"Now something comparable is taking house inward the developing world.... Emerging countries are no longer content to endure sources of inexpensive hands together with low-cost brains. Instead they likewise are becoming hotbeds of innovation, producing breakthroughs inward everything from telecoms to carmaking to wellness care. They are redesigning products to trim back costs non only past times 10%, but past times upwards to 90%. They are redesigning entire concern processes to exercise things improve together with faster than their rivals inward the West.
"As our special report argues, the rich basis is losing its leadership inward the sort of breakthrough ideas that transform industries. This is partly because rich-world companies are doing to a greater extent than inquiry together with evolution inward emerging markets. Fortune 500 companies forthwith own got 98 R&D facilities inward mainland People's Republic of China together with 63 inward India. IBM employs to a greater extent than people inward developing countries than inward America....
"Even to a greater extent than striking is the emerging world’s growing mightiness to brand established products for dramatically lower costs: no-frills $3,000 cars together with $300 laptops may non seem every bit exciting every bit a novel iPad but they hope to alter far to a greater extent than people’s lives. This sort of advance—dubbed “frugal innovation” past times some—is non only a thing of exploiting inexpensive labour (though inexpensive labour helps). It is a thing of redesigning products together with processes to cutting out unnecessary costs. In Bharat Tata created the world’s cheapest car, the Nano, past times combining dozens of cost-saving tricks."
_______________
Added note:
Louis Johnston writes from the College of St. Benedict at St. John's University to state me that Robert Allen's article is also Chapter iv of Allen's recent book Global Economic History: Influenza A virus subtype H5N1 Very Short Introduction (http://amzn.com/0199596654).