Minnesota: Paying More Federal Taxes, Receiving Less Federal Spending

Here's an op-ed column of mine that appeared inwards the (Minneapolis) Star Tribune on Sunday, March 18. I'll pose the opening paragraphs here, in addition to all of it below the fold:

"Minnesota taxes: More blessed to give?"
"Minnesota pays its fair part -- in addition to and so closed to -- inwards federal taxes, piece federal spending hither is decidedly below average. Why the imbalance?"

The dandy terra firma of Minnesota rides inwards a lifeboat amongst 49 other states, tossed yesteryear the current of air in addition to waves of global politics in addition to the global economy.

States vary inwards many ways -- population, size of the terra firma economy, historic menstruation distribution, manufacture mix, geography. No 1 should hold off that they volition all brand the same contribution to keeping the lifeboat afloat.

But still, it's eyebrow-raising to discovery that Minnesota is 1 of the states consistently putting a lot to a greater extent than into the federal budget than it gets back. That's the message when you lot compare federal taxes paid yesteryear residents in addition to businesses inside each terra firma amongst federal spending inwards each state.


"Minnesota taxes: More blessed to give?"
"Minnesota pays its fair part -- in addition to and so closed to -- inwards federal taxes, piece federal spending hither is decidedly below average. Why the imbalance?"
Article by: TIMOTHY TAYLOR

The dandy terra firma of Minnesota rides inwards a lifeboat amongst 49 other states, tossed yesteryear the current of air in addition to waves of global politics in addition to the global economy.
States vary inwards many ways -- population, size of the terra firma economy, historic menstruation distribution, manufacture mix, geography. No 1 should hold off that they volition all brand the same contribution to keeping the lifeboat afloat.
But still, it's eyebrow-raising to discovery that Minnesota is 1 of the states consistently putting a lot to a greater extent than into the federal budget than it gets back. That's the message when you lot compare federal taxes paid yesteryear residents in addition to businesses inside each terra firma amongst federal spending inwards each state.
The most recent information seems to live on for 2009. The U.S. Census Bureau, inwards its Consolidated Federal Funds report, breaks downward domestic federal spending to the terra firma level.
It includes authorities payments to individuals, procurement, grants, in addition to the salaries in addition to payoff of federal employees. Minnesota received $45.7 billion inwards federal spending inwards 2009.
On the taxation side, the Internal Revenue Service Data Book for 2009 reports that gross federal taxes collected from Minnesota inwards 2009 were $67.6 billion.
This includes all federal taxes: private in addition to corporate income taxes; payroll taxes for Social Security in addition to Medicare, in addition to estate, gift in addition to excise taxes. Minnesota has an above-average per capita income, in addition to so it pays to a greater extent than than average inwards federal taxes.
Do the math: In 2009, Minnesota received close 68 cents inwards federal spending for every $1 paid inwards federal taxes. Putting the taxation in addition to spending numbers inwards per-capita price is specially striking.
For the U.S. of A. of America as a whole, federal spending was $10,395 per mortal inwards 2009.
For Minnesota, federal spending was $8,676 per mortal -- close sixteen percentage below the average.
For the U.S. of A. of America as a whole, federal taxes paid were $7,690 per mortal inwards 2009.
In Minnesota, federal taxes paid were $12,763 per mortal -- close 66 percentage inwards a higher house average. (Of course, the U.S. authorities had an enormous budget deficit inwards 2009, so the average spending per mortal far exceeded the average taxes per person.)
This full general designing has held for a reveal of years. Analysts at the Tax Foundation calculated that if you lot rank states on the set down of federal taxes paid per capita, Minnesota ranked from 11th to 15th over the years from 2001 to 2005. But when states are ranked on the set down of federal spending per capita, Minnesota ranked from 45th to 48th.
In the Tax Foundation's combined rankings -- that is, federal spending received per dollar of federal taxes paid -- Minnesota ranked from 45th to 48th over the 2001-2005 fourth dimension period.
Writers at the Economist periodical performed similar inquiry terminal summer. By their calculations, over the 20-period from 1990 to 2009, this gap betwixt federal taxes paid yesteryear Minnesotans in addition to federal spending received yesteryear Minnesotans added upwards to the equivalent of ii years worth of gross terra firma production for Minnesota.
By this measure, Minnesota ranked 49th amid the states over this fourth dimension inwards federal spending received relative to federal taxes paid, ahead of exclusively Delaware.
What leads to a province of affairs where a terra firma is consistently sending to a greater extent than to the federal authorities than it is receiving back? Or vice versa?
Along amongst Minnesota in addition to Delaware, other states amongst a habit of paying to a greater extent than inwards federal taxes than they have inwards federal spending include New Jersey, Illinois, Connecticut, New York in addition to New Hampshire.
States typically at the other halt of the range, amongst a designing of to a greater extent than federal spending received than taxes paid, include New Mexico, Mississippi, West Virginia, Alabama, North Dakota in addition to Alaska.
No 1 explanation applies as to all of these states, but next are 4 master copy factors.
Income. States amongst a designing of paying to a greater extent than to the federal authorities than they have are all above-average inwards income. Also, Delaware, New York in addition to Illinois are all places amongst large numbers of major corporate headquarters, therefore boosting the corporate taxes from those states.
Poverty. States amongst fewer people below the poverty line bring less demand for federal back upwards through antipoverty programs similar nutrient stamps or Medicaid. Minnesota ranks 4th amid states for lowest poverty rate. New Hampshire, Delaware, New Bailiwick of Jersey in addition to Connecticut all rank inwards the peak 10 for lowest poverty rate. On the other side, Mississippi, New Mexico, Alabama in addition to West Virginia all rank amid the peak 8 inwards states amongst the highest poverty levels.
Elderly. A large proportion of elderly way a grouping whose members typically bring lower incomes in addition to are receiving Social Security in addition to Medicare benefits. Minnesota ranks 40th amid states inwards part of population older than 65. West Virginia in addition to North Dakota are inwards the peak five.
Defense. Spending on defense forcefulness is quite unevenly distributed across states. Some Minnesota companies bring defense forcefulness contracts, but the terra firma does non bring large armed forces bases, national inquiry laboratories or the genuinely enormous defense forcefulness contractors. Defense spending inwards 2009 averaged $1,753 per mortal for the U.S. of A. of America as a whole; inwards Minnesota, federal defense forcefulness spending averaged $786 per person.
Of course, it would live on light-headed to fence that every terra firma should have only as much inwards federal spending as it contributed inwards taxation revenue. The U.S. of A. of America is to a greater extent than than the heart of l states.
Even if Minnesota doesn't bring large armed forces bases in addition to ports, people hither create goodness from national defense forcefulness spending.
If someone spends their working life inwards Minnesota, in addition to so retires in addition to draws Social Security inwards New Mexico, it doesn't seem unfair inwards the least. States amongst higher incomes should pay to a greater extent than inwards taxes, in addition to states amongst higher poverty should have to a greater extent than federal support.
Nonetheless, Minnesota's condition as a terra firma that consistently pays to a greater extent than to the federal authorities than it receives should brand us all ponder.
Higher federal spending on national defense, antipoverty programs, transportation, wellness insurance in addition to to a greater extent than volition typically atomic number 82 to a province of affairs inwards which Minnesota taxpayers volition live on paying to a greater extent than to back upwards those programs than Minnesotans are going to have inwards straightaway spending.
Federal taxation cuts, yesteryear the same logic, volition tend to disproportionately create goodness Minnesota; federal taxation increases volition disproportionately burden Minnesota.
In a reveal of cases, a narrowly Minnesota perspective suggests that it would live on to a greater extent than inwards our state's collective involvement to pursue state-level taxing in addition to spending policies, rather than supporting national policies inwards which Minnesota's federal taxation dollars volition spill out federal spending inside Minnesota.
As an American, I don't advocate a purely Minnesota-centric perspective on federal spending in addition to taxes. But as a Minnesotan, I discovery myself paraphrasing the sentiments of Tevye from the sometime musical "Fiddler on the Roof":
"Of course, there's no shame inwards beingness consistently close the bottom of terra firma rankings comparison federal spending received to federal taxes paid.
"But it's no dandy honor, either."
----------
Timothy Taylor is managing editor of the Journal of Economic Perspectives, based at Macalester College inwards St. Paul. He blogs at conversableeconomist.blogspot.com.